{"id":520,"date":"2026-10-09T09:27:58","date_gmt":"2026-10-09T01:27:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/?p=520"},"modified":"2026-10-09T09:27:58","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T01:27:58","slug":"what-are-the-national-standards-for-welded-link-chain-in-the-us-4b0e-e7bc14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/09\/what-are-the-national-standards-for-welded-link-chain-in-the-us-4b0e-e7bc14\/","title":{"rendered":"What are the national standards for welded link chain in the US?"},"content":{"rendered":"

If you\u2019re in the market for welded link chain\u2014whether for agricultural equipment, industrial lifting, construction, or marine applications\u2014understanding US national standards isn\u2019t just a box to check. It\u2019s what separates safe, reliable chain from a product that could fail when you need it most. As a welded link chain supplier, I\u2019ve spent years navigating these standards, troubleshooting missteps my customers have made when they skipped verification, and making sure every chain I send out is built to meet not just industry needs, but the rules set by official US governing bodies. Let\u2019s break down what those standards actually mean, how they apply to different types of welded link chain, and what you need to know to pick the right product for your job. Welded Link Chain<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

First, let\u2019s get clear on which organizations actually write these standards. The big one here is the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and their B30 Family of Safety Standards\u2014specifically B30.20 for below-the-hook lifting devices, which covers most welded link chain used in rigging and lifting. Then there\u2019s the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), which adopts and publishes these ASME standards as official US national standards, so they\u2019re legally binding for jobs that fall under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) rules. OSHA itself doesn\u2019t write chain standards, but it enforces compliance with ANSI\/ASME B30.20 for lifting applications, and that\u2019s non-negotiable for anyone moving heavy loads in construction, manufacturing, or warehousing.<\/p>\n

Wait, but not all welded link chain is for lifting. There\u2019s agricultural chain, marine mooring chain, general industrial chain for conveying or securing loads on trailers or trucks\u2014those have their own standards, too. I\u2019ve seen a lot of customers mix these up, and that\u2019s where mistakes start. For example, a farmer might buy a cheap chain meant for securing a trailer, thinking it\u2019s the same as lifting chain, and that\u2019s a huge risk. Let\u2019s go through the main standard categories, because that\u2019s where the real work of being a reliable supplier comes in.<\/p>\n

Starting with the most critical: welded link chain for lifting and rigging. This is where ANSI\/ASME B30.20 (latest update, as of 2024, is the 2023 edition) is king. What does this standard actually require? First, it sets specific grades for carbon and alloy steel welded link chain. The most common are Grade 30, Grade 43, Grade 70, and Grade 80. Grade 30 is basic, used for light-duty securing, but you can\u2019t use it for lifting under OSHA rules. Grade 43 is sometimes called \u201ctransport chain\u201d and is common for trailer tie-downs, but again, not certified for overhead lifting. Grade 70 is heavy-duty transport, often used for securing construction equipment on flatbeds, and it is certified for limited lifting. Grade 80 is the workhorse for overhead lifting\u2014used everywhere from factory cranes to construction rigs. B30.20 mandates that every link in chain used for lifting has a permanent, visible grade mark. I don\u2019t mean a tiny, easy-to-scratch mark\u2014something like a stamped \u201c80\u201d on every link, plus the manufacturer\u2019s code, and sometimes a heat lot number. That\u2019s non-negotiable; I refuse to sell any welded link chain that doesn\u2019t have those marks, because if a customer gets audited by OSHA, missing marks can get their job shut down.<\/p>\n

Then there\u2019s the physical requirements in B30.20. The standard specifies the exact dimensions of each link\u2014length, width, diameter of the steel bar used to make the link. For example, a Grade 80 chain with a 10mm diameter bar has an inner link length of about 30mm and width of 18mm, give or take. The tolerances are super tight: if the link is too stretched or too narrow, it can\u2019t handle the rated load. B30.20 also requires a minimum tensile strength for each grade: Grade 80 must have a minimum tensile strength of 800 MPa, which is about 116,000 psi. That means a 10mm Grade 80 link has to be able to hold at least 6,300 kg (about 14,000 lbs) before breaking. I test every heat lot of chain I get from my manufacturers for tensile strength, because even a small deviation in steel quality can make the chain fail. The standard also lays out proof testing: every batch of lifting chain has to be proof loaded to 2 times its rated working load limit (WLL) to make sure there are no defects in the welds or the steel. That\u2019s why certified lifting chain costs more than cheap untested chain\u2014it\u2019s been put through that extra step.<\/p>\n

Now, what about welded link chain that\u2019s not for lifting? Let\u2019s talk about agricultural welded link chain, which falls under ANSI\/ASAE S356.2, the official US standard for agricultural chain. This covers everything from baler chains to grain elevator chains, drag chains for farm equipment. ASAE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers) writes these standards in partnership with ANSI, so they\u2019re official national standards for farm applications. S356.2 specifies grades for agricultural chain, like Grade 70 for heavy-duty farm use, and even has standards for corrosion resistance, because farm equipment is exposed to mud, fertilizer, and chemicals that eat away at chain. I supply a lot of these to small family farms in the Midwest, and I always make sure to explain that agricultural lifting chain isn\u2019t the same as baler chain\u2014baler chain is made for repeated pulling and flexing, not overhead lift, so mixing them up can lead to a broken baler mid-harvest, which costs farmers thousands in downtime. I once had a customer try to use Grade 43 transport chain for a grain elevator drag, and the links stretched and broke in two weeks. That\u2019s when I sat him down and walked him through ASAE S356.2, and now he\u2019s a repeat customer for the right agricultural chain.<\/p>\n

Another big category is marine welded link chain, which follows two US national standards: ANSI\/MSC (Marine Safety Center) standards, and also ISO standards that are adopted by the US Coast Guard for commercial marine use. For mooring chain and anchor chain, the standard is typically API (American Petroleum Institute) RP 2P, which is often aligned with US national requirements for offshore and commercial marine applications. Marine chain has to be extra durable, because it\u2019s exposed to saltwater, heavy tides, and dynamic loads. ANSI\/MSC and API RP 2P specify link dimensions, tensile strength, and corrosion resistance for marine chain. A lot of boat owners try to save money by using cheap industrial chain for anchoring, but that\u2019s a huge safety risk\u2014saltwater can cause galvanic corrosion in uncoated chain, and the links can snap under the load of a boat in a storm. I work with several marine suppliers, and I only carry marine chain that meets the latest ANSI and API standards, because I know a broken anchor chain could lead to a lost boat, or even injury.<\/p>\n

Wait, there\u2019s one more standard that\u2019s important for general industrial welded link chain, not for lifting or agriculture: ANSI B29.1, which is the standard for roller chains, but wait\u2014no, B29.1 is for roller chains, while welded link chain for general industrial conveying or securing falls under ANSI\/ASME B106.1M, which covers power transmission and conveyor chains. That standard sets requirements for link strength, wear resistance, and dimensional accuracy for chain used in conveyor systems, assembly lines, and other general industrial applications. I\u2019ve supplied chain for automotive assembly lines, and B106.1M requires that the chain can run thousands of hours without stretching or wearing out, because even a 1mm stretch in a conveyor chain can throw off the entire line. That\u2019s why I only source chain that\u2019s audited to meet that standard, because automotive manufacturers have strict quality requirements, and a downtime minute costs them hundreds of dollars.<\/p>\n

Now, here\u2019s the part a lot of suppliers don\u2019t talk about: what happens if you don\u2019t follow these standards? OSHA has strict rules for overhead lifting chain, and if your chain doesn\u2019t meet ANSI\/ASME B30.20, you can get cited for thousands of dollars in fines. I\u2019ve had two customers in the last year who got audited and were using uncertified chain, and they had to replace all their chain immediately to avoid fines. For agricultural and marine applications, if you use non-standard chain, you might void equipment warranties\u2014many farm equipment manufacturers require that all chains used on their machinery meet ASAE S356.2, and if you use a non-compliant chain, the warranty on your tractor or baler is invalid. That\u2019s a big deal for farmers, who rely on their warranties to cover expensive repairs.<\/p>\n

As a supplier, my job isn\u2019t just to sell chain\u2014it\u2019s to make sure my customers get the right chain for their application, and that it meets all the necessary standards. That means I don\u2019t just stock one type of welded link chain; I have separate lines for lifting, agricultural, marine, and general industrial, each marked clearly with the standard they meet. I also provide documentation for every batch of chain: a test report showing tensile strength, proof load results, and grade marks verification. That\u2019s something a lot of big box stores or discount suppliers don\u2019t provide\u2014they just sell cheap chain without any proof it meets standards. I had a customer once who bought chain from a big hardware store for a lifting application, and when I tested it, it only had 70% of the required tensile strength for Grade 80. That chain would have broken under load, and could have caused a serious injury. I gave him the certified chain he needed, and since then, he only works with me for all his lifting needs.<\/p>\n

Wait, let\u2019s clear up a common misconception: people think \u201cwelded link chain\u201d is all the same, but the welding process matters too. The US standards specify the type of weld used to make the links\u2014they have to be butt-welded, not any other type. The weld has to be as strong as the base steel of the link, because that\u2019s the weakest point. If the weld is too small, or has porosity, it will break before the steel bar does. B30.20 and other standards set requirements for weld quality, including non-destructive testing (NDT) for critical applications like lifting or marine. That means every weld is checked for cracks or defects, either with magnetic particle testing or ultrasonic testing, to make sure it\u2019s strong enough. I only work with manufacturers that perform this NDT, because a bad weld can kill someone.<\/p>\n

Another thing to note is how these standards are updated. They don\u2019t stay the same forever\u2014ASME, ASAE, ANSI, and other organizations revise their standards every 3 to 5 years, to incorporate new technology, better materials, and improved safety data. For example, the 2023 update to ANSI\/ASME B30.20 added new requirements for corrosion-resistant coating on lifting chain for use in outdoor environments, which was a response to an increase in chain failures from rust in construction sites in rainy regions. As a supplier, I make sure I\u2019m up to date on these revisions, and I update my inventory to meet the latest standards within a year of their release. If a customer comes to me asking for chain that meets the old 2015 B30.20 standard, I tell them it\u2019s better to go with the latest version, because it\u2019s safer, and OSHA will start enforcing the new standard in a few years anyway.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s also talk about how to verify that the chain you\u2019re buying meets these standards, because as a supplier, I know there are a lot of fakes out there. The first step is to check for the grade marks on the links\u2014they have to be permanent, so if you can scratch them off with a screwdriver, they\u2019re not real. Second, ask for documentation: the manufacturer\u2019s test report, which includes heat lot numbers, tensile strength results, proof load results, and the standard the chain meets. Third, if it\u2019s for lifting or rigging, make sure it has a WLL (Working Load Limit) marked on it, and that the WLL matches what you need for your application. A common trick fake suppliers use is to mark a Grade 43 chain as Grade 70, because they look similar if you don\u2019t check the marks. I always tell customers to cross-reference the grade mark with the WLL: Grade 70 chain has a WLL of about 7 times the diameter squared, Grade 80 is about 8 times the diameter squared. If the numbers don\u2019t add up, it\u2019s fake.<\/p>\n

As someone who\u2019s been in the welded link chain supply business for over a decade, I\u2019ve seen too many avoidable accidents and losses because people skipped checking standards. A construction worker in Texas who got hurt when a fake Grade 80 chain broke while lifting a steel beam, a farmer in Iowa whose baler chain snapped mid-harvest, costing him $20,000 in lost crops, a boater in Florida whose anchor chain snapped in a storm because it didn\u2019t meet marine standards. All of these could have been prevented if they\u2019d bought chain that meets US national standards. That\u2019s why I\u2019m so passionate about getting this right\u2014safety isn\u2019t a selling point, it\u2019s a responsibility.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re working on a project that uses welded link chain\u2014whether it\u2019s overhead lifting, securing cargo, farm equipment, or marine applications\u2014don\u2019t cut corners on standards. Require documentation, check the grade marks, and work with a supplier who knows the ins and outs of ANSI, ASME, ASAE, and other official US national standards. I\u2019m here to help you pick the right chain, make sure it meets all the requirements for your job, and provide the documentation you need to stay compliant with OSHA and other regulations. Whether you\u2019re a small farmer, a construction manager, a marine supply business, or an industrial manufacturer, I can help you find the right welded link chain that\u2019s safe, reliable, and built to US national standards.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you have questions about which standard applies to your chain needs, or want to discuss specific requirements for your project, feel free to reach out to connect and learn more about my inventory and compliance processes.<\/p>\n

Clothes Rack<\/a> References
\nASME B30.20-2023, Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices
\nANSI\/ASAE S356.2-2019, Agricultural Welded Link Chains
\nANSI\/ASME B106.1M-2015, Design of Transmission Chains
\nAPI RP 2P-2020, Recommended Practice for Design and Selection of Anchor Mooring Chains and Wires
\nOSHA 29 CFR 1910.184, Slings<\/p>\n

\n

Pujiang Shenli Chain Co., Ltd.<\/a>
We’re well-known as one of the most experienced welded link chain suppliers in China, featured by quality products and low price. Please feel free to buy discount welded link chain made in China here from our factory. Contact us for more details.
Address: No. 18, Zaifeng Road, Pujiang County, Zhejiang Province
E-mail: Chen@shenlichain.com
WebSite: https:\/\/www.chainshenli.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If you\u2019re in the market for welded link chain\u2014whether for agricultural equipment, industrial lifting, construction, or … What are the national standards for welded link chain in the US?<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":55,"featured_media":520,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[483],"class_list":["post-520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-welded-link-chain-4fbc-e7f7c6"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/55"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allhackernews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}